Bush Knew

Today’s NY Daily News story is flying around the blogosphere, and justly so, since it alleges that the president of the United States has had guilty knowledge of felonies committed inside his own White House for over two years:

Other sources confirmed, however, that Bush was initially furious with Rove in 2003 when his deputy chief of staff conceded he had talked to the press about the Plame leak.

Bush has always known that Rove often talks with reporters anonymously and he generally approved of such contacts, one source said.

But the President felt Rove and other members of the White House damage-control team did a clumsy job in their campaign to discredit Plame’s husband, Joseph Wilson, the ex-diplomat who criticized Bush’s claim that Saddam Hussen tried to buy weapons-grade uranium in Niger.

A second well-placed source said some recently published reports implying Rove had deceived Bush about his involvement in the Wilson counterattack were incorrect and were leaked by White House aides trying to protect the President.

"Bush did not feel misled so much by Karl and others as believing that they handled it in a ham-handed and bush-league way," the source said.

If the story is true — and Josh Marshall has the lowdown on its author’s long-standing ties to Bush insiders — then Bush has been lying for over two years.  (Josh’s site, incidentally, is all over this story like nobody else today.  One-stop shopping.  Go.  Read lots.  Guy’s terrific.)

Note that Bush was originally not pissed about the crime, which sabotaged national security for short-term political gain.  He was just upset that it wasn’t committed elegantly.

Playing I-told-you-so for a moment, this certainly explains Bush’s strange unprovoked proclamations of ignorance which caught my ear in July.

He’d have good reason.  When you’ve had people on your own staff committing crimes, and you’ve been lying about your own guilty knowledge for years, sticking to your story would be the only chance of evading unindicted co-conspirator status.  Or worse.

For anyone who doesn’t follow what this is all about — maybe you only watch the teevee news, which Jon pulls apart today nicely for the umpteenth time — there’s a fairly exhaustive look at the case at Wikipedia.

Scottie McClellan: Bush so did NOT break that broken lamp

Farce:

QUESTION:  Thanks.  Is it true that the President slapped Karl Rove upside the head a couple of years ago over the CIA leak?

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Are you referring to, what, a New York Daily News report?  Two things:  One, we’re not commenting on an ongoing investigation; two, and I would challenge the overall accuracy of that news account.

QUESTION:  That’s a comment.

QUESTION:  Which part of it?

QUESTION:  Yes, that is.

QUESTION:  Which facts —

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  No, I’m just saying — no, I’m just trying to help you all.

QUESTION:  So what facts are you challenging?

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Again, I’m not going to comment on an ongoing investigation.

QUESTION:  You can’t say you’re challenging the facts and then not say which ones you’re challenging.

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Yes, I can.  I just did.  (Laughter.)

It goes on and on like that.

Scottie is just as nonsensical and self-serving concerning Iraq, only now it’s just tragic and sad:

Q Why were 18 children killed?

MR. McCLELLAN: Our military goes out of the way not to target innocent civilians.

Q I’m not saying they were targeted —

MR. McCLELLAN: Our military goes out of the way to target the enemy, and to —

Q Why did they say 18 children?

MR. McCLELLAN: — bring to justice the terrorists and those who are seeking to prevent democracy from taking hold, through violent means, to justice. And that’s what our military does. And they do —

Q Seventy people were killed by an air strike.

MR. McCLELLAN: Helen, please let me respond, because I think it’s important to point this out when you’re bringing up a question like this. We fully support our men and women in uniform. They’re doing an outstanding job to defend our freedoms and to help the Iraqi people move forward on a free —

Q I’m not saying — I’m saying why did they kill 70 people?

MR. McCLELLAN: — to move forward on a free and peaceful future…

Reminds me a lot of Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on 60 Minutes, discussing the horrific impact of a decade of U.S. sanctions on Iraq:

Lesley Stahl: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it.

Scottie McClellan: Bush so did NOT break that broken lamp

Farce:

QUESTION:  Thanks.  Is it true that the President slapped Karl Rove upside the head a couple of years ago over the CIA leak?

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Are you referring to, what, a New York Daily News report?  Two things:  One, we’re not commenting on an ongoing investigation; two, and I would challenge the overall accuracy of that news account.

QUESTION:  That’s a comment.

QUESTION:  Which part of it?

QUESTION:  Yes, that is.

QUESTION:  Which facts —

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  No, I’m just saying — no, I’m just trying to help you all.

QUESTION:  So what facts are you challenging?

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Again, I’m not going to comment on an ongoing investigation.

QUESTION:  You can’t say you’re challenging the facts and then not say which ones you’re challenging.

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Yes, I can.  I just did.  (Laughter.)

It goes on and on like that.

Scottie is just as nonsensical and self-serving concerning Iraq, only now it’s just tragic and sad:

Q Why were 18 children killed?

MR. McCLELLAN: Our military goes out of the way not to target innocent civilians.

Q I’m not saying they were targeted —

MR. McCLELLAN: Our military goes out of the way to target the enemy, and to —

Q Why did they say 18 children?

MR. McCLELLAN: — bring to justice the terrorists and those who are seeking to prevent democracy from taking hold, through violent means, to justice. And that’s what our military does. And they do —

Q Seventy people were killed by an air strike.

MR. McCLELLAN: Helen, please let me respond, because I think it’s important to point this out when you’re bringing up a question like this. We fully support our men and women in uniform. They’re doing an outstanding job to defend our freedoms and to help the Iraqi people move forward on a free —

Q I’m not saying — I’m saying why did they kill 70 people?

MR. McCLELLAN: — to move forward on a free and peaceful future…

Reminds me a lot of Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on 60 Minutes, discussing the horrific impact of a decade of U.S. sanctions on Iraq:

Lesley Stahl: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it.

Scottie McClellan: Bush so did NOT break that broken lamp

Farce:

QUESTION:  Thanks.  Is it true that the President slapped Karl Rove upside the head a couple of years ago over the CIA leak?

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Are you referring to, what, a New York Daily News report?  Two things:  One, we’re not commenting on an ongoing investigation; two, and I would challenge the overall accuracy of that news account.

QUESTION:  That’s a comment.

QUESTION:  Which part of it?

QUESTION:  Yes, that is.

QUESTION:  Which facts —

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  No, I’m just saying — no, I’m just trying to help you all.

QUESTION:  So what facts are you challenging?

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Again, I’m not going to comment on an ongoing investigation.

QUESTION:  You can’t say you’re challenging the facts and then not say which ones you’re challenging.

SCOTT McCLELLAN:  Yes, I can.  I just did.  (Laughter.)

It goes on and on like that.

Scottie is just as nonsensical and self-serving concerning Iraq, only now it’s just tragic and sad:

Q Why were 18 children killed?

MR. McCLELLAN: Our military goes out of the way not to target innocent civilians.

Q I’m not saying they were targeted —

MR. McCLELLAN: Our military goes out of the way to target the enemy, and to —

Q Why did they say 18 children?

MR. McCLELLAN: — bring to justice the terrorists and those who are seeking to prevent democracy from taking hold, through violent means, to justice. And that’s what our military does. And they do —

Q Seventy people were killed by an air strike.

MR. McCLELLAN: Helen, please let me respond, because I think it’s important to point this out when you’re bringing up a question like this. We fully support our men and women in uniform. They’re doing an outstanding job to defend our freedoms and to help the Iraqi people move forward on a free —

Q I’m not saying — I’m saying why did they kill 70 people?

MR. McCLELLAN: — to move forward on a free and peaceful future…

Reminds me a lot of Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on 60 Minutes, discussing the horrific impact of a decade of U.S. sanctions on Iraq:

Lesley Stahl: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it.

Apple needs to talk with Patrick Fitzgerald


In 2006, what will be the most popular program on the Video iPod’s 2.5" screen?
An ant-like line of tiny men in orange jumpsuits marching out of the White House

371
  59.8%
 
Desperate Housepudus

173
  27.9%
 
CSI: Lilliput

53
  8.5%
 
Two And A Half Inch Men

23
  3.7%
 

But how will we know the era of elective war, economic lunacy, theocratic nonsense, and social irresponsibility-as-reigning ideology is possibly ending?

New poll at left.