Have a look at this Kos diary.

If you want to know why the "news" media couldn’t be bothered to report
enough actual news to prevent an elective war based on lies that were
plainly nonsensical at the time — and why, 2.5 years, tens of
thousands of deaths, and hundreds of billions of dollars later, they’re
still strugging to burp up the obvious — that diary explains a big part of it.

Personal experience with same issues: when my radio commentaries were syndicated, one of the reasons we didn’t get on more stations was because
Program Directors were cowed by ownership (often ClearChannel) and
afraid some liberal might piss off advertisers, especially in the hysterical post 9-11 climate.  Never mind the awards I’d won, or that in over a thousand commentaries, I never once had to retract
anything in a single broadcast.  The question wasn’t quality, accuracy, even entertainment value; it was avoiding any risk of
displeasing advertisers and ownership.

Matter of fact, I got canned from the biggest news station in Los Angeles specifically because
I was talking about stories the rest of the "news" didn’t, even though
the new boss who canned me didn’t have the guts or honesty to admit it
to my face.  (He’d grumbled at me for years, but when the day came, he said they were "cutting back all their features,"
although they a) kept every moralistic right-winger who would never
dream of criticizing corporate influence and b) replaced me
specifically with the unpointed musings of a Ted Baxterish TV anchorman
with remarkably little to say.)

I mention this a) because obviously, yeah, it still bugs me when I’m reminded of it, and b) much more to personally vouch, from direct
experience, for the only bias that matters in media.  It is real.  This is how this stuff
works.  (Incidentally, management denials of any such bias are almost
always sincere; they have drunk the Kool-Aid, they deeply believe what
they do actually accomplishes something, and that’s a big part of why
they succeed.)

These are businesses, after all.  You are not the media’s customer; you are
their product.  Their only customers are the advertisers.  That is all
that matters.

It’s right in front of our faces, all the time.  Jon gets it right here, too, as I mentioned yesterday.

The anonymous Kos writer isn’t perfect, but he gets the gist absolutely correct.

Have a look at this Kos diary.

If you want to know why the "news" media couldn’t be bothered to report
enough actual news to prevent an elective war based on lies that were
plainly nonsensical at the time — and why, 2.5 years, tens of
thousands of deaths, and hundreds of billions of dollars later, they’re
still strugging to burp up the obvious — that diary explains a big part of it.

Personal experience with same issues: when my radio commentaries were syndicated, one of the reasons we didn’t get on more stations was because
Program Directors were cowed by ownership (often ClearChannel) and
afraid some liberal might piss off advertisers, especially in the hysterical post 9-11 climate.  Never mind the awards I’d won, or that in over a thousand commentaries, I never once had to retract
anything in a single broadcast.  The question wasn’t quality, accuracy, even entertainment value; it was avoiding any risk of
displeasing advertisers and ownership.

Matter of fact, I got canned from the biggest news station in Los Angeles specifically because
I was talking about stories the rest of the "news" didn’t, even though
the new boss who canned me didn’t have the guts or honesty to admit it
to my face.  (He’d grumbled at me for years, but when the day came, he said they were "cutting back all their features,"
although they a) kept every moralistic right-winger who would never
dream of criticizing corporate influence and b) replaced me
specifically with the unpointed musings of a Ted Baxterish TV anchorman
with remarkably little to say.)

I mention this a) because obviously, yeah, it still bugs me when I’m reminded of it, and b) much more to personally vouch, from direct
experience, for the only bias that matters in media.  It is real.  This is how this stuff
works.  (Incidentally, management denials of any such bias are almost
always sincere; they have drunk the Kool-Aid, they deeply believe what
they do actually accomplishes something, and that’s a big part of why
they succeed.)

These are businesses, after all.  You are not the media’s customer; you are
their product.  Their only customers are the advertisers.  That is all
that matters.

It’s right in front of our faces, all the time.  Jon gets it right here, too, as I mentioned yesterday.

The anonymous Kos writer isn’t perfect, but he gets the gist absolutely correct.

Today’s NY Daily News story is flying around the blogosphere, and justly so, since it alleges that the president of the United States has had guilty knowledge of felonies committed inside his own White House for over two years:

If the story is true — and Josh Marshall has the lowdown on its author’s long-standing ties to Bush insiders — then Bush has been lying for over two years.  (Josh’s site, incidentally, is all over this story like nobody else today.  One-stop shopping.  Go.  Read lots.  Guy’s terrific.)

Note that Bush was originally not pissed about the crime, which sabotaged national security for short-term political gain.  He was just upset that it wasn’t committed elegantly.

Playing I-told-you-so for a moment, this certainly explains Bush’s strange unprovoked proclamations of ignorance which caught my ear in July.

He’d have good reason.  When you’ve had people on your own staff committing crimes, and you’ve been lying about your own guilty knowledge for years, sticking to your story would be the only chance of evading unindicted co-conspirator status.  Or worse.

For anyone who doesn’t follow what this is all about — maybe you only watch the teevee news, which Jon pulls apart today nicely for the umpteenth time — there’s a fairly exhaustive look at the case at Wikipedia.

Farce:

It goes on and on like that.

Scottie is just as nonsensical and self-serving concerning Iraq, only now it’s just tragic and sad:

Reminds me a lot of Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on 60 Minutes, discussing the horrific impact of a decade of U.S. sanctions on Iraq:

Farce:

It goes on and on like that.

Scottie is just as nonsensical and self-serving concerning Iraq, only now it’s just tragic and sad:

Reminds me a lot of Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on 60 Minutes, discussing the horrific impact of a decade of U.S. sanctions on Iraq: